Showing posts with label Editorials. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Editorials. Show all posts

British Royalty Through Film

Something struck me watching The Madness of King George for our upcoming Helen Mirren episode - it might be possible to put all the movies about the British Monarchy in order and follow hundreds of years of their reign.  Here's my best attempt going back to Henry VIII who is unsurpassed in The Tudors TV series.  I'm sure there are other movies I've missed, so feel free to help me fill in gaps.  Here's one thing I found - Helen Mirren appears twice, as does Judi Dench.

Henry VIII (1509-1547) - There have been lots of movies and tons of books about Henry and his many wives, Anne of the Thousand Days, The Other Boleyn Girl, etc.  And Henry appears in all of those, from hot young Jonathan Rhys Meyers and Eric Bana to old and fat Richard Burton.

Edward VI (1547-1553) - He's rarely portrayed as anything more than a young boy.

Jane (9 days in 1553) - Lady Jane - A fascinating movie with a very young Helena Bonham Carter as a women who was put up as Queen to maintain the Protestant line for a bit, but failed.


Mary I and Philip, Elizabeth I (1553-1558, 1558-1603) - Elizabeth, Elizabeth: The Golden Age, Shakespeare in Love - We get a kooky view of Mary just before she dies trying to get Elizabeth to protect the Catholics.  Thankfully, we have a pretty solid view of Elizabeth's reign and her Protestant faith.  We even see her as a friend of Shakespeare's for a few award worthy minutes.

James I (1603 - 1625) - The New World - He's creepy because his paternal grandmother and maternal grandfather were siblings.  His mother was Mary, Queen of Scots who has been played by Vanessa Redgrave and IMDB says Saoirse Ronan will be playing her soon.  He was the one who sent the explorers around the world because he was devoutly Protestant. Also James I was King for the original Guy Fawkes day, so he was obviously quite popular (that was a joke).

Charles I (1625-1649) - After him, there's a gap in the monarchy for a bit.

Charles II (1660-1685) - Restoration - He's played by Sam Neill who pulls of the pissy attitude that Charles II must have had given that his reign was pretty hard to come by.

James II, William III & II and Mary (1685-16881688-1702) - Orlando  They both have brief moments in Orlando putting Tilda Swinton's character in context.  Oh, and there's a whole college named for them, so that's cool too.

Anne, George I, George II (,1702-17014, 1714-1727, 1727-1760) - I sense there is something they appear in since it's such an uproarious time for the monarchy, switching from the House of Stuart to Orange to Hanover, but I can't find it.

George III / George IV / William IV (1760-1820, 1820-1830, 1830-1837) - The Madness of King George - This was a fascinating look at what happens to mental illness in the 1700s, and how a King is a King except when he's crazy.  There's good evidence to suggest that the madness that the King experienced was a disease called porphyria that caused nervous system issues for short periods.  Nigel Hawthorne as King George, the same King George who lost the American Revolutionary War, is amazing.  He was obviously scarred by losing the colonies.  His older son George IV is portrayed by Rupert Everett in the film as a dandy who liked women, but produced no children, so his younger brother William (only a child in the film) became King after him.  However, it was their younger brother's daughter who got to be Queen next.

Victoria (1837-1901)- The Young Victoria, Mrs. Brown  - We get a look at her earliest hours as Queen in Victoria and the beginnings of her love affair with Albert thanks to Keira Knightly.  And then later, Judi Dench plays Victoria nearing the end of her reign, and shows us a supposed affair with a friend (the Mr. Brown of the title).  I sense there is a lot more to her reign that would make up a movie.  There was a miniseries in 2001 that might have made a dent, but I haven't seen it.  As Empress of India and Queen of a huge empire, I'm surprised she doesn't have more screen time.

Edward VII (1901-1910) - Couldn't find anything on film except a short appearance in Mrs. Brown

George V / Edward VIII / George VI (1910-1936, 1936, 1936-1952)- The King's Speech, W. E., it's not really possible to talk about the reign of any one without the others since Edward VIII abdicated after less than a year as King after his father's death.  Michael Gambon as George V was pretty bad ass, and a pretty terribl father in The King's Speech.  Someday I'm sure we'll get a more definitive film about Edward VIII since he's incredibly fascinating (gave up the throne for a woman) and not particularly sympathetic so far (thought to sympathize with the Nazis).  Colin Firth did George VI justice, from the stutter to the strength (and even the smoking that led to lung cancer later).  Bit part for Elizabeth II, and Elizabeth, the Queen mum whose hair was perfect her entire life.

Elizabeth II (1952-present) - The Queen, though it only covers about 2 weeks of her reign it captures the mood of a country and an inside look at how the monarchy might see itself.

In Defense of the Annoying Wives Club

(Editor's Note: Spoilers for t.v. shows Dexter, Mad Men, Breaking Bad, The Walking Dead and Weeds)

Excuse me while I dive into a television rant. With the dramatic television series really taking off over the past decade, at least for the cable companies, we have gotten some truly amazing shows, and with them some damn fine leading male characters and actors. Unfortunately, it would seem their female counterparts are getting short-changed.

Of course I don't have time to watch every television show, but from the ones I do follow, that are currently still in production, I have noticed a theme: we often lash out at the women who defy our male protagonists. But here's the rub, those protagonists are alcoholic philanderers, drug dealers, and murderers. In a logical world, I'd say we're siding with the wrong people.

For me, it all started with Rita (Julie Benz) on "Dexter." When we first met Rita, she was fresh out of an extremely abusive marriage with a heroin addict. Eventually she started to come out of her shell, and for most fans it was too much. Suddenly, she was demanding and whiny toward our lovable serial killer. She was constantly on his case about some trivial first world issue, from the house, to the new baby, to money, etc. And by the time she made her exit in the Season 4 finale, we were all shocked, but not terribly saddened to see her go.

But let's step back and look at this from Rita's point of view. No doubt her past abuse left her with serious trust issues. She had two young children she had to protect. At one point, just as she began trusting Dexter, she suspected him of drug addiction, which he admitted to so she wouldn't find out his real addiction. Then they split up for a bit so he could be with another psychopath. Once they got back together, she ended up pregnant and with a shotgun wedding. So by the time Harrison was born, she was in full on bitch mode. However, she was at home with a newborn, plus two older children, all day while her new husband, with whom she'd had trust issues in the recent past, was at work all day and on a killing spree all night. As grating as she was to listen to, her past experiences shaped her just as much as Dexter's did, but the show wasn't named after her and we side with the far more layered serial killer.

Then there was Betty Draper (January Jones) of "Man Men" fame. Betty was married to a cheating jerk. Unfortunately, she was married to a sexy, smooth-talking cheating jerk, whom we all adore.

Betty was raised as a rich daddy's girl, went on to modeling and ultimately (for awhile) landed Don Draper. But the fairytale soon ended as Don spent many nights away from his upper-middle class suburban family to "work late," which normally required boffing everyone from secretaries to clients to his daughter's grade school teacher. However, it's not all lack of writing and character development that make Betty an unsympathetic character: it's January Jones. Her acting skills are a bit stunted, especially when up against some of the show's other heavyweights. So while I should have been feeling sorry for Betty as she found out about her husband's whoring around and secret past life, I was too busy trying not to reach into my television to wipe the perpetual sneer off her face. After all, in the beginning, all Betty wanted was more attention from Don and not just his checkbook. Yet once again we felt sorry for morally corrupt Don and we did a happy dance that it was Betty's eventual affair that led to the dissolution of the Draper union at the end of Season 3. And her subsequent demise in her new marriage (to a very decent fellow) is just the icing on the cake.

However, it was the recent attacks on Skyler White (Anna Gunn) of "Breaking Bad" that drove me over the edge. Skyler had a rough ride over the last "year" with a surprise baby at 40 coupled with the news that her husband of twenty years was diagnosed with aggressive lung cancer. Then she learned that Walter turned to cooking meth as a way to provide for her and their children after his inevitable early death. After a lot of back-and-forth, Skyler eventually climbed aboard, running the business at their new carwash to launder the money coming in from Walter's meth lab.

Then Skyler had a change of heart. After finding out how close a drug lord was to murdering her entire family over Walt's dealings, she decided to become emotionally unstable, so her sister would take their children out of the home until Skyler and Walt could "work things out." When a furious Walt confronted her about her recent shenanigans, she freely admitted she's just waiting for the cancer to end him so they can all be safe again. At first I was appalled at the audacity of the ungrateful witch. But wait...Skyler's just doing what any sane, good mother would do. She's doing her best to protect her children while backed into a corner by her husband who's grown greedy for more. Sadly the way the writer's have presented her leaves the audience screaming for her blood.

And yet even when we're given a "good" husband, the wife still can't come through as a likable counterpart. Rick and Lori (Sarah Wayne Callies) Grimes of "The Walking Dead" are a shining example. Rick seems to be the ultimate do-gooder, trying to hold on to his humanity in a world turned upside down by a plague of zombies. And yet he's stuck with the whiniest wife of them all. It seems everyone had an immediate dislike of Lori from the pilot. But why?

Lori had an affair with Rick's best friend because she thought her husband was dead and because Shane helped save her and her son. Faced with such extreme circumstances, I believe it could easily happen. And when her husband returned, she promptly ended the affair. She understandably gets upset every time Rick wants to run off to save the day: after all, she thought she lost him once already, and in a zombie apocalypse, no where is safe. But once again we are faced with poor writing of a character. Lori is bossy, whiny and simply ungrateful for everything she still has. However, as a wife, I don't think she's being unfair. I more detest Lori for her atrocious parenting skills (who lets an 8-year-old run around unsupervised in a zombie apocalypse?) than how she acts toward her husband. And still she's the most hated of the show.

I wish I could end this with saying that if the tables were turned, and the female protagonist was the beloved badass, then there would be far superior writing of her character, but as "Weeds" has proven, that's not necessarily the case.

Now widowed three times over, Nancy Botwin (Mary-Louise Parker) started out as an extremely sympathetic and lovable character, a recently widowed middle class suburban mom of two boys, who turned to dealing pot to other soccer moms to make ends meet. There were so many times in those first couple of seasons that I genuinely liked Nancy and felt bad for the crappy situations she'd fall into. But once she started getting romantically involved with a Mexican coke lord, putting herself and sons in danger beyond belief, her spunky outlook turned to pure narcissism and everything that followed screamed "Me Me Me!" Now I just keep watching the trainwreck to see how screwed up everyone, especially Nancy, will be by the finale, so I can smirk at their deserved demise.

Should it be this way, any of it? Can audiences, myself included, just step back and look at these women with anything but contempt. Not as long as the show runners keep churning out such petty, annoying, weak-willed partners to our flawed, but beloved male protagonists. As long as the male characters are still being written as layered sympathetic villains and the wives have the most annoying gender clichés thrust upon them, nothing will change, though it desperately needs to.

Movies for Women?

Watching Magic Mike this past weekend and seeing a theater full of women enjoying a movie together, it made me wonder how well movies aimed at mostly adult women fare.  This doesn't necessarily mean just romantic comedies, though they are often described that way anyway.  So I took a look at the top 50 grossing films from the past 10 years for each year based on total grosses by boxofficemojo and picked out those that I felt were fairly solidly marketed only at adult women.
Only twice in the past 10 years have movies that are targeted at women been in the top 10 highest grossing movies of the year (2009's The Blind Side at #8 with $255million, and 2002's My Big Fat Greek Wedding at #5 with $241million and Chicago at #10 with $170million).  In 2 different years, 2007 and 2005 no movie targeted toward women made over $100million, and if you check out the titles, you can see why women were more discerning that year.  How can this be?  Must movies be required to reach larger demographics to be successful?


My question probably becomes: if movies aimed at women don't make a lot of money, why don't they just make BETTER movies aimed at women so more people will want to see them?  Both of the cofounders of REEL INSIGHT are women (trust us).  We also have fairly different taste in films, but if a movie is genuinely good, we're pretty quick to agree.  And, if it is generally accepted that a good movie, not all great movies, but usually good movies will make money, why aren't there more good movies aimed at women?  I don't have a good answer for this, and I don't know if it comes down to the fact that a teenage boy will see a movie in theaters 5 times, but most adult women won't see it more than once and are thus a less valuable market.  Or if there aren't enough women making decisions about what movies get made to make movies targeted toward women.  I refuse to believe it's because women's movies are inherently bad or that women just don't go to the movies.  It must be more complicated that that.

Now that I've written this, I'm actually really curious to ask an adult male friend to go through the same 10 years and pick out the movies are marketed toward or aimed at only adult men.  Does such a thing exist?  Or are all movies that adult men enjoy either neutral adult movies (aimed at neither men nor women) or teenage boy films?  I'm curious.  Thoughts?  Any volunteers to take that on for me? 

For your amusement (the # is their rank that year in list of highest grossing films, and the $ is about how much it grossed):
2011 - #13 The Help $169M and #14 Bridesmaids $169M 
2010 - #24 Valentine's Day  $110M, #33 Sex and the City 2 $95M,  #42 Eat Pray Love, $80M
2009 - #8 The Blind Side  $255M,  #16 The Proposal $163M #28 It's Complicated $112M, #34 Julia and Julia $94M, #35 He's Just Not that Into You $94M
2008 - #11  Sex and the City $152M,  #13 Mamma Mia $144M, #37 What happens in Vegas $80M
2007 - #47 P.S. I love you $53M
2006 - #17 Devil Wears Prada $124M, #18 The Break up $118,  #19 Dreamgirls $103M, #21 Failure to Launch $88M
2005 - #23 Monster in Law $82M, #45 Memoirs of a Geisha $50M
2004 - #15  50 First Dates $120M #32 The Notebook $81
2003 - #24 How to lose a guy in 10 days $105M,  #29 Charlie's Angels 2 $100M, #32 Legally Blonde 2 $90
2002 - #5 My Big Fat Greek Wedding $241M, #10 Chicago $170M, #19 Sweet Home Alabama $127M, #26 Maid in Manhattan $94